Ghostbusters: Legacy

I enjoyed the first half more, balancing nicely on the edge of nostalgia, where it was still bearable. But then the digital crap kicked in (there's no substitute for practical 80s effects), and Finn Wolfhard made me feel like I was watching a weaker episode of Stranger Things. And as much as I love the old crew from the 80's classic, they unfortunately – and surprisingly to me – weren't the element that lifted the film up at the end. A brief reminiscence is not enough for me. And when the post-credit scene is the only fun thing in a film, there’s something wrong. (12.01.2022)

I liked it in the first half with its nostalgic retro vibe, but as it moves on and they start messing around with ghosts more, the new Ghostbusters becomes a nasty digital cringefest. The pleasantly energetic teenage adventure turns into a sort of shoddy respectful tribute to a couple of old-timers who save the day, though they look like they can barely stay on their feet. And the small town where it all takes place seems hilariously empty. (15.01.2022)

The first Ghostbusters crossed with an Amblin-like children's summer adventure in a small town. Yes, it's undeniably an instant double load of 1980s nostalgia, but it's so sensitive compared to many others who've tried their hand at something similar and overused it in recent years. In fact, it works for the most part on its own (perhaps only the final quarter is too shot-by-shot and the same film). When you add in that "Legacy" (even in a creative father-son Ivan/Jason way), it can conjure a smile as much as it can grab your heart. Much better than one would dare hope for a sequel that comes a decade or so later than it should. What's more, it's a successful sequel that doesn't try anything groundbreaking, but fills its box solidly and entertainingly. (20.03.2022)

Ghostbusters of the new generation and it's a fun ride for all ages. The story takes place three decades after the first film, we follow a mother and her two children moving to a small town, to a farm their grandfather has left them as his inheritance, and the adventure ride can begin. It has a Stranger Things feel to it, maybe maybe because of Finn Wolfhard, but I really enjoyed Mckenna Grace (by the way what an amazing career at 15 years old: Malignant and Ready Player One), who plays a science nerd and is without a doubt the most interesting and best character. The humour works occasionally, although nothing crazy happens, the visuals are ok, but the CGI monsters were the weakest part of the film for me, though I loved the marshmallow men, they were morbidly cute and could easily have deserved an extra ten minutes. The film also relies a lot on nostalgia and references, which of course work. The film is also nicely heartwarming at the end and the fairer sex might be moved, which counts. It's not a big hit, but as a horror comedy for kids where adults can have fun it works well enough. Story 4/5, Action 3/5, Humour 3/5, Violence 0/5, Funny 4/5 Music 3/5, Visuals 3/5, Atmosphere 4/5, Suspense 3/5, Emotion 3/5, Actors 4/5.7/10. (09.01.2022)

A laid-back movie that mainly encourages you to watch the two preceding two parts. All of the characters are just great, likeable and well-acted. The central heroine with the face of Mckenna Grace is just wonderful. The wonderfully well-depicted nerdy outsider status with young side-kick Logan Kim carries Ghostbusters along with him in amazing way. Raitman decided for a Stranger Things type atmosphere, and he was right, because they are - you have to admit it - almost the same thing.  Then he added the Ectomobile and some other contraptions from the original Ghostbusters. The ending is more like a big cameo show/farewell (which hardened fans will certainly appreciate) than a full-blooded conclusion. The attempt at a different approach takes it down a little, but I understand that without it everybody would be disappointed. (09.01.2022)

Ghostbusters Nr. 4 ist leider in der Zeit von Covid erschienen und auch nach mehreren Jahren haben diesen Film nicht alle bemerkt, die die vorigen Teile mochten. Was schade ist. Ghostbusters Nr. 3 hatten dank des rein weiblichen Teams Werbung. Die neue Generation baut darauf auf, dass Harold Ramis verstorben ist. Die ganze Geschichte konzentriert sich daher hauptsächlich auf die Familie Spengler. Das Konzept an sich ist sehr angenehm, die Spenglers lebten bisher außerhalb der Welt der Ghostbusters und mit der Entdeckung ihres Erbes vom Großvater kann sich die Erinnerungen an die Abenteuer der 80er Jahre auch das Publikum erfrischen. Im Vordergrund stehen die Teenager und ihre neuen Freunde aus der Provinz. Alles fügt sich schön zusammen und am Ende kommen auch Dan Aykroyd, Bill Murray und Ernie Hudson. Alles ist also richtig. Es ist die Rückkehr der klassischen Familienunterhaltung, die lange gefehlt hat. (11.04.2024)

I’m as satisfied as I was in 2015 with Jurassic World. Once again, it was a fantastic follow-up to a film that everyone loves, introducing brand new characters, not just relying on nostalgia, entertaining for two hours old-timers and newcomers alike, having people in the cinema smiling from ear to ear. I really wasn’t expecting Afterlife to be so good, it’s such a joy. I was pleasantly surprised that the film doesn't have a main male character, but a heroine (Finn Wolfhard sorry, Mckenna Grace really rules here), and such a great heroine at that. But actually all the characters are funny, never awkward, and Jason Reitman cares as much about them as he does about the special effects, which beautifully combine the digital and the practical and, like everything else, are a joy to behold. If you are not moved by the opening, you will be moved by the ending. I would really love another sequel to fully close the circle. (07.01.2022)

Wrapping empty boxes in the shiny paper of '80s nostalgia... Stop it, Hollywood. (04.01.2022)

"Who you gonna call?" Sieht man einmal von der fünf Jahre alten weiblichen Version ab, ist dies eine Rückkehr in die Welt von Ghostbusters nach einigen Jahren. Die Originalfilme aus den 80er Jahren können mich auch heute noch ansprechen - ob es nun die Schauspieler, die guten Effekte oder der eingängige Titelsong sind. Legacy vermischt sichtlich das Alte mit dem Neuen - dank der (offensichtlichen) Anspielungen und der Originalbesetzung spürt man die allgegenwärtige Nostalgie, während man sich andererseits bemüht, ein jüngeres Publikum anzusprechen. Mehr als einmal erinnerte ich mich während der Vorführung an Stranger Things - und nein, das lag nicht an Finn Wolfhard - und am Ende musste ich sogar an den vierten Teil von Harry Potter denken. Einerseits war es schön, die alte Garde - soweit möglich - wiederzusehen, andererseits waren sie eher aus nostalgischen Gründen dabei. Ich fand die neue Besetzung mit Ausnahme von Paul Rudd und Logan Kim so langweilig. Bessere drei Sterne! (06.01.2022)

The first half isn't bad at all, as Reitman keeps managing to portray those teenage characters and the ethos of youth quite nicely. Even though the character of fifteen-year-old Trevor is written totally like the character of Morty in the first season of Rick & Morty, and the whole setting is actually an insanely moronic attempt to sell us "80s nostalgia" in the present day. All it takes is a sleepy, undeveloped town in Oklahoma with no cell service and we can have a drive-in diner on roller skates and a substitute Ryan Reynol... sorry Paul Rudd playing 80s horror movies on VHS for the kids. I mean, what do you expect from a movie where memberberries are actually incorporated into the story. But okay, I'll be nice, the film is surprisingly patient at first, a little wordy and relatively on its feet. Except I kept wondering why I wasn't enjoying it so much. The problem is that the original theme, which served to get a bunch of funny people together, dress them in funny costumes, and create situations for them and the effects people (and, by extension, the viewer) to have fun in, is suddenly turned into some completely nonsensical lore that fetishizes every nut and bolt from the original films. Then, in the clueless conclusion, it's downright obvious how this material isn't at all suited to expanding its universe, so in a panicked reaction, it overreacts by finishing with digitally rejuvenated actors or outright holograms of dead people, all in a way that makes you think damn, is it truly possible that I won't be at peace even after death? Anyway, I'm more generous towards the film than I normally would be thanks to its first half, though this fake "nostalgia for the 80s that never was" doesn't deserve it. It is, after all, a genre created by 40-somethings to sell the memories of their childhood to younger generations who, when they've shaken off their youthful openness to change, will only retain the information about how great America was under Reagan. (05.04.2022)

Either I wasn't in the right mood or I'm too old to properly appreciate the qualities of this sequel to the now cult movie. It seems to me that, despite the best efforts of the creators, somehow the charm of the original Ghostbusters has been lost. Let’s face it, the main trio of Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd and Sigourney Weaver is simply irreplaceable. (55%) (18.04.2023)