Regie:
Michael CrichtonDrehbuch:
Michael CrichtonKamera:
Gene PolitoMusik:
Fred KarlinBesetzung:
Richard Benjamin, Yul Brynner, James Brolin, Norman Bartold, Victoria Shaw, Alan Oppenheimer, Dick Van Patten, Linda Gaye Scott, Majel Barrett (mehr)Inhalte(1)
In Westworld, einem exklusiven Vergnügungspark der Zukunft, können die Besucher jederzeit die Helden spielen und gegen Roboter antreten, die sich kaum vom Menschen unterscheiden. Aus dem Spaß wird jedoch blutiger Ernst, als die Roboter, die sich eigentlich um die Gäste kümmern sollten, plötzlich außer Rand und Band geraten und die Herrschaft an sich reißen wollen. (TNT Film)
(mehr)Videos (1)
Kritiken (6)
Auch ein Roboter hält nicht alles aus. Wenn also Yul Brynner mehrere Male ein lachender Urlauber erschießt, kann es einfach nicht gut ausgehen. :) Westworld hat mir einst sehr gut gefallen. Ich kann mich noch gut daran erinnern, wie ich am Ende, wenn es um alles geht, vom Entsetzen gepackt wurde. Nach einigen Jahren ist der Film ein bisschen verblasst und ich sehe ein, dass er manchmal fast unerträglich langwierig ist. Sein Gedanke ist aber zum Glück gleich geblieben. ()
An interesting sci-fi film, reflecting the anxieties and dark visions of Western society in the 70s. It was a time when the green movement emerged, criticism of the consumerist lifestyle spread, and fear of an over-technologized future emerged. Crichton's film is about how seemingly perfect technology turns against people and the robots that are meant to serve in an amusement park massacre both customers and staff. Yul Brynner plays the lead role of a rebellious gunslinger robot. I was somewhat bothered by the combination of sci-fi and western genres, but it was understandably a positive aspect for the American market. Overall impression: 55%. ()
A very unconventional sci-fi film set in the wild west. The story is not exactly brimming with action and suspense, but watching good old cowboy fights makes the viewer feel at home and the special atmosphere adds colour. The best, however, is Yul Brynner, who fits perfectly into the plot with his uncompromising gaze. It's not a smash hit, but it's a nice and original spectacle for one viewing. ()
Crichton may be a writing mastermind at evoking the hidden dangers of technological toys, but the actual result of his work behind the camera is reminiscent of his scientists' creations - a semi-functional vehicle that beckons with original tinsel, but which shuts down at the first dramatic collision. Yul Brynner walks around fiercely over eighty-eight minutes, but in hindsight, it feels more ridiculous than threatening. It took two decades for an eccentric billionaire to fish lizards out of mosquitoes in a similar vein. PS: The idea is so strong that despite the shabby treatment, I actually understand Abrams and Nolan's need to turn it into a series. ()
It's such a strange, peculiar film that I stopped enjoying it towards the end, but it has ideas. It's obvious that Crichton knew how to come up with a good story and make it interesting. It can't take away from its interesting visual and special effects execution, which is great in places. But as it progressed, I didn't pay much attention to it anymore. ()
Werbung