Im August in Osage County

Sex and the City nach dreißig Jahren. Auf dem Dorf. Die Männer bekommen hier nicht besonders viel Raum, sie entspannen nur ab und zu die schwüle Atmosphäre des verzankten Familientreffens der Frauen. Töchter sind wie ihre Mütter. Dank der Besetzung, die Gas gibt, ist der Film mehr als nur gut. Meryl spielt wieder unglaublich. Manchmal sollte das Tempo aber langsamer werden, damit die Zuschauer*innen eine Chance haben, Gefühle und Gedanken von dem Streit aufzuarbeiten, bis es zu einer nächsten und noch schnelleren sowie intensiveren Auseinandersetzung kommt. Der Film könnte sich in den verlangsamten Stellen dem Milieu und dem Ort widmen, wo er sich abspielt. Er könnte am Aufbau der Stimmung arbeiten. Dem Beziehungsgeflecht der Figuren würde das nur guttun und das Werk würde im Gedächtnis der Zuschauer*innen nicht nur als eine TV-Theaterverfilmung bleiben, sondern auch als Film, der eine große Leinwand und seine Schauspielstars verdient. (06.02.2014)

Do you know those (theatrical) conversational comedies where a group of people gather in a closed space and argue bitterly? Carnage or the French What's in a Name are two typical examples. So, this is something similar but much more cruel, where your smile will quickly become bitter because when the characters say something nasty, they really mean it. Meryl Streep is fantastic, as usual, and Julia Roberts is in great form. (12.01.2014)

Already when I found out what this movie was about I was thinking that the only thing that could mesmerize me here are the acting performances. In the end, there was one and it was none other than Meryl Streep, who keeps proving every year that she has reached her acting summit. But the thing is she has been on the top of her game for several years, or decades now. I tip my hat off to her. But the movie as such has nothing that would interest me. The premise is good but the execution isn’t too great and if it wasn’t for Meryl, I would consider this movie another family existential drama, which you get dime a dozen. I must admit that I have no idea what the stage play that the movie is based on would have to offer me. But I definitely understand that it can serve as the ground for some good acting performances. However, in my opinion this is pretty selfish and egotistical of the authors. You see two hours are a bit too long for a movie like this. (11.02.2014)

A pretty depressing psychological drama. Fortunately, I’m immune to depression, so there wasn’t much to recover from. On the other hand, I can’t say I’m immune to Julia Roberts. Her wounded expression succeeded in annoying me as always. The story is a cliché – a family gathers at a funeral, which hardly leads to anything pleasant. Most of us are used to that thanks to our own family reunions. What I liked were the performances of Meryl Streep and Chris Cooper. Otherwise, I preferred Fireflies in the Garden. (30.12.2016)

A film that presents excellent acting performances and then... well, that's all there is. The actors are able to express emotions, and they do it absolutely brilliantly, but that's simply it, you won't find anything more. The story is not necessary here, it can be immediately recognized that it was originally a play. However, watching a play on the screen, and that for two hours, may not be such a strong experience, which was also achieved by the film "Carnage", which is slightly shorter. The acting performances are intense, but it's still just theater and the film adaptation doesn't add much to it. Only those truly familiar faces. (02.02.2014)