Frühling für Hitler

Der gelungenste und lustigste Brooks. Für mich jedenfalls. Es ist unmöglich, nicht über Max' Verführung "älterer“ Frauen, Leos neurotische Anfälle oder den verrückten Nazi-Drehbuchautor zu lachen. Wenn das Schlimmste passiert (ja, die Premiere des Musicals), kann man nur noch laut lachen und sich auf der Couch wälzen. "Germany was having trouble, what a sad, sad story. Needed a new leader, to restore it´s former glory...“ (03.05.2009)

♫ Germany was having trouble, what a sad, sad story. Needed a new leader, to restore it´s former glory. Where, where was he? Where could that man be? We looked around and then we found, the man for you and me. And now it's... Springtime for Hitler and Germany. Deutschland is happy and gay. We're marching to a faster pace, look out, here comes the master race. Springtime for Hitler and Germany. Winter for Poland and France. Springtime for Hitler and Germany. Come on, Germans, go into your dance. I was born in Düsseldorf and that is why they call me Rolf. Don't be stupid, be a smarty come and join the Nazi party! Springtime for Hitler and Germany. Goose step's the new step today. Bombs falling from the skies again. Deutschland is on the rise again. Springtime for Hitler and Germany. U-boats are sailing once more. Springtime for Hitler and Germany. Means that soon we'll be going... We've got to be going... You know we'll be going... To war! ♫ (10.11.2007)

Yes! Mel Brooks may have made better and funnier films, but I have to admit that The Producers has an undeniable charm. First of all, it's always nice to see big Hollywood, or rather the equally big Broadway, making fun of itself, and it's an even nicer feeling when its extensive mockery has Adolf Hitler and the Nazis as its target. And Brooks fulfils his mischievous plan to perfection, putting together a very original and witty script and letting all the talented actors perform in such a style that you don't know where to turn your eyes (Dick Shawn triumphed in the end for me, he’s truly unforgettable as gay Hitler). The age has taken its toll, but the idea remains excellent. 75% (16.02.2014)

I have never really liked films by Mel Brooks because my sense of humor is simply set differently. On the other hand, the film received a few awards, including an Oscar for the screenplay, and the reviews and comments were very decent, so I eventually invested in The Producers. Although I acknowledge that it is Brooks' best film, I certainly didn't go crazy about it. Honestly speaking, it is the only film where I didn't roll my eyes at the humor used in moments when I felt it was slipping into awkwardness. The most valuable thing is the idea itself, but its execution tends to get lost in it. I miss that refined word humor of someone like Francis Veber and truly clever gags. With the exception of Gene Wilder, the actors in the lead roles didn't sit well with me either. However, I think there was potential here and it would have been interesting if a specialist in comedies had filmed a remake based on a quality screenplay. I haven't seen the new version of this film yet, but according to reviews, it is weaker. Overall impression: 55%. (27.04.2009)

The first version of "The Producers" that I ever saw was the one from 2005. I think it's not quite the same when a person sees a remake for the first time, but they can still compare. The 2005 version of "The Producers" is a classic musical that is mixed with crazy comedy. The 2005 version of "The Producers" is not far from being a crazy comedy, but it is primarily a satire on how the backstage of creating musicals works, with all its flaws and scams. Max Bialystock raises money for his bad plays by satisfying wealthy retired ladies, who then sign his "cheque", without which he cannot produce plays. It is during one such satisfaction that Leo Bloom, an accountant, arrives to clean up his books. And he discovers an interesting thing. They can make a huge amount of money by making a play that will be a complete flop. And so they start working on a play called "Springtime for Hitler". Believe me, the central melody will inevitably stay in your head for some time after the end of the film. The original "Producers" is not a musical in the true sense of the word. Singing only appears here when the play is rehearsed or when the play is directly presented to the initially very dissatisfied audience. Where the decisive aspect for "The Producers" in 2005 is the homosexual concept, there Mel Brooks benefited from the fact that the 60s were the era of hippies and it worked perfectly for the film. Hitler in this performance was simply perfect. Mel Brooks did not create a film that is filled with twists, its plot is straightforward, and that makes it easier to focus on the comedic aspect, which works perfectly here. A legendary film that did not need a remake, but it happened. Many viewers may find the new version more acceptable, but in its execution, the comedy looks like silly grotesque. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/11/arbitrage-interview-male-deti-neznamy.html (02.03.2013)