Soldiers of Fortune

No, what can we say, I choose some movies just to see them, to see how bad they can be. It's unbelievable how sometimes some actors want to excel, they don't want to play much, they just want to look down the barrel of a gun and aim at someone, as if they shoot them. "Soldiers of Fortune" doesn't have a completely unknown cast. On the contrary, actors like Sean Bean, Ving Rhames, Christian Slater, Dominic Monaghan, or James Cromwell have already had their moments and some of their roles are literally memorable. Just think of Ving Rhames' role in "Pulp Fiction". But here everyone agreed that it's time to take a little break and shoot something that could remotely resemble the concept of "Expendables". However, they lack everything. Apart from real action stars, there's also a meaningful story, which "Expendables" had in both cases, some emotions other than laughter, and above all, action scenes that are worth something. Long-range shooting is fun, but I enjoyed it more in the movie "Enemy at the Gates". A few rich guys decided to pay for some super adrenaline fun. They get transported to a place where they can shoot each other. They didn't realize that shooting at pigeons is not the same thing. But they have enough fun. It just doesn't transfer to the viewer at all, who keeps watching with their eyes closing and after an hour realizes they fell asleep and the end credits are rolling. The film cost eight million and I wonder how much could be made in our country with that money... Maybe it wouldn't be better, but there would definitely be more movies. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2013/01/divosi-10-years-divoka-stvoreni-lets.html (05.03.2013)