kaylin

It's unfortunate that Indian films pay the price for the fact that the filmmakers don't focus on one genre but focus more on giving the audience what is expected. Unfortunately, this is also true of Chudail Story, where there are scenes that are romantic and that are somewhat action-packed, but there are basically none that are the least bit scary. Unfortunately, even Chudail Story didn't improve the reputation of Indian horror for me.

I have to say that I liked this film. The theme is indeed quite expected - after all, the racial issue is alive, but it's done well, with interesting actors, and most importantly the story is interesting and it's good that it's been highlighted. The fact that there is still racial intolerance in America - and not only there - will continue to be an issue for a long time.

This is a film about how Jessica Chastain is a great actress, but it has to be admitted that actors like Idris Elba, Kevin Costner and Michael Cera also belong here. However, Jessica stands out so much that she just outshines them. She really is more than just beautiful - she's great! This story suited her perfectly. The spitefulness of almost the entire film is pleasant.

It's such a shame to take a subject as interesting as the background of Watergate, which is such an interesting story written by reality itself, and screw it up with so many actors who are really good. That's very reprehensible. Liam Neeson is good, but you can tell that he is just routinely playing a role that is overall very cut-and-dried and terribly boring.

I rate the film highly because it deals with a subject that I think is very important. The film is not pointing out that there is a problem with waste, but that there is a problem with people who are so inconsiderate toward nature that they don't even see how they are destroying themselves. This is another powerful demonstration of how deadly humans are to this planet.

On the one hand, Darkest Hour is primarily a one-actor film, and Gary Oldman proves his mastery here. On the other hand, it's also a film about a time that was very unpleasant, but in which people still lived and wanted to live, and it can even be presented in a funny way. Churchill was a strong personality and deserved a film like this.

This is a romantic film about two young men falling in love, one of who is a little younger. At first glance, it’s nothing revolutionary, but at second glance it’s a beautiful film about love, nature, people, and a time period. Everything here is captured so accurately, naturally, and sensitively that the entire time I was watching how simply beautiful a film can be.

1922 is actually a simple story about how a farmer wanted to get rid of his wife, but it all went horribly wrong because she was still capable of causing evil even after death. However, 1922 is not so much based on King's novel, but rather on the performance of Thomas Jane, who shows that he should definitely not be underestimated.

I can't help it, but I perceive the movie "Manifesto" more as an experiment, which is an interesting example of how it is possible to conceive a film, as well as an example of how it is possible to act. Cate Blanchett is here like a chameleon, and it is she - not the thoughts - that makes it worth watching the movie.

It has a good theme done well, and I mean visually, but the film deserved to have been conceived a little differently. Either go deeper into the psychology and take it a little more seriously, or - and this would be better - if it was a little more bizarre and gritty, maybe even lightened up in some moments. This way it pushes the envelope too much without really adding anything to the topic.